APRIL 芸能人
0post
2025.11.28 12:00
:0% :0% (50代/男性)
人気のポスト ※表示されているRP数は特定時点のものです
//
📻ポッドキャスト更新🎙️
\\
"GOOD BYE APRILのラヂオやねん"第57回配信!💁♂️
・前世の喧嘩
・持ち続けるモノ
・悩むよりも考える
▼最新回はこちら
https://t.co/cXyD3SP2zg
※毎月第2・第4金曜更新予定
@SpotifyJP
#ラヂオやねん https://t.co/uFg5lgOqkX November 11, 2025
3RP
みんなー👋本日與真司郎は37歳になりました!!たくさんのお祝いコメントありがとう😭
ほんまに変わらずみんなから愛してもらえて僕は本当に幸せです🥹
そして、2026年4月22日、アーティスト活動を再開してから初となるフルアルバムのリリースが決定しました💙
約4年半ぶりのアルバムで、
アルバムのタイトルは「THIS IS HOW I AM」です🔥
倭国語では、"これが俺の在り方”という意味で、今回のアルバムに入ってる全曲のプロデュース・作詞・作曲に参加し、等身大の與真司郎を作品に投影し、今僕が伝えたいメッセージがたくさん詰まっています🙈💙
詳細はオフィシャルサイトに随時更新していくのでチェックしてなっ😆
https://t.co/l5xQRHoIzG
今年はこれからオンラインサロン旅行もあるし、トークショーもあるし、来年はアルバムをひっさげたフルライブツアーも💙
他にも動いてるものがあるからこれからも応援してくれると嬉しいです!!これからもみんなでたくさんいい思い出作りましょう✌️
本当に本当にいつもありがとう🙇♂️
ラブユー💙💙💙
Hey everyone 👋 I turned 37 today!! Thank you for all the birthday wishes 😭
I’m so lucky that I get to keep receiving love from all of you 🥺
And on April 22nd 2026, I’m going to be releasing my first full album after restarting my artist journey💙
It’s my first album in 4 and a half years, titled “THIS IS HOW I AM”🔥
I participated as a producer, writer and arranger for every song on this album, portraying my true self in the music. It’s packed with messages that I want to share with all of you 🙈💙
Details will be continually updated on my official site, so be sure to check it out 😆
This year I have my online salon vacation, talk shows, and next year a full live tour based on the album💙
There’s other things moving in the background, so it would be great if you can keep cheering me on!! Let’s keep on making amazing memories together✌️
Thank you always 🙇🏻♂️
Love you 💙💙💙
https://t.co/s1FgEPYkIp November 11, 2025
1RP
🌙𝗧𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗞 𝗬𝗢𝗨🎙️
#ラジアナ ありがとうございました!
大鵬の太朗さんの熱い想いが嬉しかったです🙌
濃いお話、ぜひタイムフリーでもお楽しみください!
radikoタイムフリー
🔗 https://t.co/xGr9NzIdoz
#GOODBYEAPRIL
#raji795
#nack5
#太鵬太朗 https://t.co/BAFe9FtDbS November 11, 2025
🏮第五篇:周君红的律师资格注销和CA Bar 硬性要求,这不是日常撕逼,这是严肃的法律问题,知法犯法,该当何罪?
📘 **周君红执业状态与加州律师考试资格
以下基于法律事实调查**
近期,周君红@zhoujunhong2024 关于自身执业经历、律师证注销原因、以及多次参加加州律师资格考试的说法,引发了大量讨论。为了避免信息混乱,我在此基于她本人公开发布的文件、推文与采访内容,对关键事实进行一次系统、客观的梳理。
以下所有内容均来自 她本人主动发布的红头文件、她公开的时间线、加州律师协会(State Bar of California)的官方规定。
一、关于她中国律师证的注销:事实与文件不符
周君红的公开叙述(多次采访中):
“我因发表政治观点,被广东省司法厅强制注销律师证。”
但她本人于 2025 年 7 月 8 日主动发布的
《广东省司法厅注销律师执业证书决定书》 显示:
📌 1. 注销原因不是政治,而是行政流程:
她于 2024 年 3 月 18 日 与所在律所签署《解聘协议书》,👉主动解除聘用关系;
自此之后 未被其他律师事务所聘用超过六个月;
根据《律师执业管理办法》自动注销。
📌 文件全文没有任何关于“发表言论”或“政治原因”的表述。
这意味着:注销属于常规行政程序,与政治无关。
二、关于她与律所的关系:她是主动解除聘用
😡虚假陈述一:她在对外叙述中多次提到:
“律所解聘我,是因为我发表观点。”
但文件中给出的事实是:
👉她本人签署了解聘协议;
解聘行为来自她与律所双方达成协议,而非单方面解雇;
文件未见任何“纪律处分”或“强制措施”的表述。
因此:
📌 她离开律所是主动行为,而非惩罚。
🈲三、注销后无法满足加州律师考试的核心资格条件
根据加州律师协会规定(可公开查阅,属于硬性规定),
外国律师想要报名 California Bar,必须满足:
必备条件之一:
必须提供 Certificate of Good Standing(良好执业证明)
由申请人原司法辖区签发,证明:
申请人为注册律师;
执照有效;
👉未被吊销、未被暂停;
处于“诚信良好”状态。
但:
📌 周君红自 2024 年 3 月 18 日 起不再属于任何律所;
📌 她的律师证已于 2024 年 11 月 25 日 注销;
📌 注销后的执照不能再出具 Good Standing。
这意味着:
❌ 自 2024 年 3 月 18 日起,她不具备外国律师报名加州 Bar 的资格。
四、她自述的“二战、三战、四战”考试时间线,与制度要求完全冲突
她公开声称:
2024 年 2 月参加第一次
2024 年 7 月参加第二次
2025 年 2 月参加第三次
她说准备的 2025 年 7 月的第四次
但加州 Bar 报名需要:
提前 4 个月 提交所有材料
外国律师必须在报名时提交 Good Standing
所有材料需通过审核后才能进入考试系统
对照她的执业状态:
✅ 加州 Bar 报名 vs 周君红执业状态:四个时间点逐一核对:
① 2023 年 10 月(对应 2024 年 2 月考试)
当时她:
仍在律所(解聘发生在 2024 年 3 月 18 日)
理论上可以向广东律协申请 Good Standing
但她迄今未公开任何凭证、也未展示报名成功记录
📌 这一次的真实性无法确认,但制度上最接近“可能”。
② 2024 年 3~4 月(对应 2024 年 7 月考试)
这一时间点,她的状态已经发生关键变化:
她 2024 年 3 月 18 日 亲自签署《解聘协议》
从这一刻起,她已不是执业律师
她无法再获得 Good Standing
加州 Bar 会在报名阶段直接拒绝
📌 → 因此“2024 年 7 月考试”不具备任何资格。
③ 2024 年 10 月(对应 2025 年 2 月考试)
这时已经进入:她的中国律师证被注销之后的阶段
(注销日期:2024 年 11 月 25 日)
她彻底失去律师身份
无法提供 Good Standing
无法进行外国律师教育等同性审核
📌 → “2025 年 2 月考试”更不可能。
④ 2025 年 3~4 月(对应 2025 年 7 月考试)
此时:她已无执照状态超过一年
无中国律师身份
无 Good Standing
无外国执照等同 JD 的资格
加州 Bar 系统会在报名入口直接拦截
📌 → “2025 年 7 月考试(她口中的第四次) absolutly impossible。”
所以:📌 她实际只能满足“第一次考试”时间点的最低要求。
📌 她声称的第二次、第三次、第四次,从制度上都不可能发生。
五、她自述的时间线,与她的叙事也存在直接矛盾
她自述:
2023 年下半年到美国
2024 年 3 月“因言论走红而被迫留美”
2024 年 3 月主动与律所解聘
解聘后六个月无人聘用 → 自动注销
但她又声称:
2024 年 7 月继续参加律师考试
2025 年 2 月继续参加律师考试
2025 年开始在美国律所工作
这些叙述与她的法律身份状态完全不符。
六、基于法律文件与制度:
✔ 1. 她的中国律师证注销属于行政自动注销,而非政治吊销。
✔ 2. 她是主动解除聘用关系。
✔ 3. 注销后未被任何律所聘用,满足自动注销条件。
✔ 4. 自 2024 年 3 月起,她已无法提供 Good Standing。
✔ 5. 加州律师资格考试需要有效执照与 Good Standing。
✔ 6. 因此她不可能参加所谓的第二、第三、第四次 Bar 考试。
✔ 7. 她公开的注销文件,本身就是最直接的证据链。
📌 这是一个非常简单的事实链:
主动解聘 → 无人聘用 → 自动注销 → 无 Good Standing → 无法报名 → 无法参加考试。
🔥 【终极结论:两项最严重的事实问题】
围绕周君红的叙事,真正的问题并不在她是否努力,也不在她是否考过某一次考试,而在于 两个层面——一个骗粉丝,一个骗系统。
下面这两点,是任何人都无法绕开的法律事实。
① 她确实欺骗了公众与粉丝(Objective Misrepresentation)
这一点有明确证据链:
(1)她明明只有一次可能的考试资格,却反复塑造“二战、三战、四战”的学霸形象。
她知道加州 Bar 需要 Good Standing,她也知道自己自 2024 年 3 月 18 日起不再具备资格,但她仍然对外持续暗示“正在考试、继续挑战、准备下一次”。
这是典型的:
虚构专业形象——Misleading the Public。
她的 20 万粉丝相信她代表“中国律师群体的专业力量”,
但她刻意隐瞒真实执业状态,利用“连续挑战最难考试”的叙事来提升名气、增强权威感。
这本质上不是虚荣,而是 系统性误导。
**② 更严重的:
她从未披露自己“主动解聘 + 自动注销”的事实,这在美国属于诚信问题(Character & Fitness issue),
在移民领域属于“material misrepresentation”——可能导致刑事责任与驱逐。**
这一点不是道德问题,是法律问题。
【关键事实】
根据她本人发布的司法厅文件:
2024年3月18日,她主动签署《解聘协议》
离职超过6个月
2024年11月25日自动注销
整个过程与政治无关
她完全知道自己已经不再是律师。
但她在美国的叙事中:
声称“被强制注销”
声称“因发表言论被迫害”
声称“连续参加加州律师考试”
声称“正在准备下一次 Bar”
未披露真实执业状态的终止
最关键的是:
**她在涉及庇护、就业、律师行业相关材料时,若隐瞒“主动解聘+自动注销”,
在美国属于“知法犯法”(knowingly misrepresenting facts)。**
🚨 这类隐瞒会触发什么法律后果?
美国法律明确规定:
8 USC §1182(a)(6)(C)(i)
任何为获取签证、身份、福利,而隐瞒“重大事实”或提供虚假信息者,
属永久不可入境(permanent inadmissibility)。
如果她在以下任一环节隐瞒真实执业终止:
庇护陈述
就业申请
律师行业相关表格
任何 Character & Fitness 审查
对律师协会的陈述
任何涉及执业历史的官方问询
那么法律后果是:
✔ 可能构成移民欺诈(Immigration Fraud)
✔ 可能触发刑事责任(18 USC §1001)
✔ 可能被剥夺身份
✔ 可能被驱逐出境(Removal)
✔ 永远无法获得任何州律师资格(终身失格)
因为:
律师行业最看重的不是能力,而是诚信。
)未披露执业终止 = 自动死亡(character fatal defect)。
这在加州是“绝对杀伤点”。
【为什么说是知法犯法?】
因为她不是普通申请人:
她自称“八年刑法律师”
她学过刑法、行政法、律师法
她完全明白主动解聘=终止执业
她完全明白自动注销=不能再发 Good Standing
她完全明白 Good Standing 是 Bar 必要条件
她清楚地知道自己在叙事中省略了关键事实
这不是“不懂规矩”,
而是“知道规则却选择隐瞒”。
这在美国叫:
Knowingly and Willfully Misrepresenting a Material Fact
(故意隐瞒重大事实)
法律性质非常严重。
🔥
周君红的问题,从来不在她是否努力,也不在她考没考过。
而在于:
她把一次可能的考试说成多次;
把主动离职说成被迫害;
把自动注销说成强制吊销;
把不具备资格说成“准备第四次”。
对公众,这是欺骗。
对系统,这是隐瞒。
对律师行业,这是致命的诚信缺陷。
对美国法律,这是“知法犯法”。
她不是被制度排除在加州律师行业之外的;
她是被她自己的叙事,排除在事实之外的。
下面是 完整、逐段精准翻译的英文版本。
语气保持冷静、专业、法律调查风,同时保留中文原文的力度与结构,适合直接发 X 或发布文章。
已为英文读者优化句式,确保逻辑严密、法律用语准确。
🏮 **Part 5: Zhou Junhong’s License Cancellation & California Bar Requirements —
This Is Not Online Drama. This Is a Serious Legal Issue: What Are the Consequences of Knowingly Violating the Law?**
📘 **A Legal-Fact-Based Review of Zhou Junhong’s
Professional Status & California Bar Eligibility**
Recent public statements by Zhou Junhong regarding her legal career, the reason her Chinese lawyer license was canceled, and her claims about repeatedly taking the California Bar Exam have triggered widespread discussion.
To avoid misinformation, this analysis is based strictly on:
the official cancellation order she herself posted,
her own publicly stated timelines, and
the State Bar of California’s published eligibility requirements.
1. Her Chinese Lawyer License Was Not Politically Revoked — It Was Canceled by Routine Administrative Procedure
Zhou’s public claim (in multiple interviews):
“My license was forcibly revoked by the Guangdong Justice Bureau for expressing political views.”
But according to the official cancellation order she posted on July 8, 2025:
📌 1) The cancellation had nothing to do with politics. It followed standard administrative rules:
On March 18, 2024, she voluntarily signed a “Termination Agreement” with her law firm.
She remained unemployed by any other law firm for over six months.
Under the “Administrative Measures for Lawyers,” this results in automatic cancellation.
📌 There is zero reference to political expression or punishment.
Her license was canceled for administrative reasons, not for political dissent.
2. Her Separation From the Law Firm Was Voluntary — Not Political Retaliation
😡 False Claim #1:
She repeatedly stated publicly:
“My law firm dismissed me because I expressed my opinions.”
Documented fact:
She personally signed the termination agreement.
The termination was mutual, not disciplinary.
The official record contains no disciplinary language, no coercion, no punishment.
📌 Her departure was voluntary. Not punitive.
3. After Cancellation, She No Longer Met California’s Mandatory Bar Exam Eligibility Requirements
According to the official rules of the State Bar of California,
foreign-trained lawyers must submit a:
Certificate of Good Standing
verifying:
their license is active,
valid,
not suspended or revoked,
and they are in good moral standing.
But:
📌 Since March 18, 2024, Zhou was no longer employed by any law firm.
📌 Her license was canceled on Nov 25, 2024.
📌 A canceled license cannot issue Good Standing.
❌ Therefore, she has been ineligible to register for the California Bar Exam since March 18, 2024.
4. Her Claims of “Second,” “Third,” and “Upcoming Fourth” Exam Attempts Are Impossible Under Bar Rules
Zhou publicly claims:
First attempt: February 2024
Second: July 2024
Third: February 2025
Preparing for a “fourth attempt” in July 2025
But California Bar registration requires:
submitting documents 4 months before the exam,
including Certificate of Good Standing,
and passing eligibility review before exam access is granted.
Now compare this with her real status:
California Bar Registration vs. Her Actual Professional Status
① October 2023 → Feb 2024 Exam
She was still employed at the time.
Theoretically possible to apply.
But she has shown no proof of eligibility or successful registration.
👉 This is the only potentially valid attempt.
② March–April 2024 → July 2024 Exam
She terminated employment on March 18, 2024.
Lost her eligibility immediately.
No Good Standing possible.
❌ Her “second attempt” was impossible.
③ October 2024 → Feb 2025 Exam
By this time her license had been officially canceled (Nov 25, 2024).
No eligibility of any kind.
❌ Her “third attempt” was impossible.
④ March–April 2025 → July 2025 Exam (“Fourth Attempt”)
She had been without a valid license for over a year.
No Good Standing.
No recognized foreign legal credential.
Application would be blocked at the system level.
❌ A fourth attempt is absolutely impossible.
**Conclusion: She Only Qualified for One Exam.
Her “second, third, fourth attempts” are institutionally impossible.**
5. Her Claimed Timeline Conflicts With Her Own Professional Status
She claims:
Arrived in the U.S. in late 2023
“Forced to stay” in March 2024 due to online attention
Terminated employment in March 2024
License canceled in November 2024
Yet she also claims:
Took July 2024 exam
Took February 2025 exam
Started working in a U.S. law office in 2025
📌 These claims cannot coexist with her legal eligibility.
6. Based on Documents & Regulatory Rules:
✔ Her license was canceled automatically, not for political reasons.
✔ She voluntarily left her firm.
✔ Six months’ unemployment triggered automatic cancellation.
✔ She has been unable to obtain Good Standing since March 18, 2024.
✔ Good Standing is mandatory for foreign lawyers to register for the California Bar.
✔ Thus her “second,” “third,” and “fourth” attempts could not occur.
✔ The cancellation order she posted is itself the key evidence.
📌 The chain of facts is very simple:
Voluntary termination → No employer → Automatic cancellation → No Good Standing → Cannot register → Cannot sit for the Bar.
🔥 FINAL SECTION: The Two Most Serious Issues
This is no longer about effort or exam performance.
This is about two non-negotiable legal issues:
① She misled the public and her followers (Objective Misrepresentation)
Evidence is clear:
She had only one possible exam attempt,
yet repeatedly portrayed herself as taking “second,” “third,” and “fourth” attempts.
She knew Good Standing was required.
She knew she lost eligibility after March 18, 2024.
But she continued implying she was actively preparing for multiple exams.
This is systematic public misrepresentation,
not mere vanity.
She leveraged the “Bar exam warrior” narrative to enhance credibility and authority among 200,000 followers — while withholding her true professional status.
**② More serious:
Her failure to disclose “voluntary termination + automatic cancellation” may constitute moral character violations or material misrepresentation under U.S. law.**
This is not a moral issue.
It is a legal one.
Key facts from her own document:
March 18, 2024 — she voluntarily terminated employment
6 months unemployed
Nov 25, 2024 — license automatically canceled
No political cause
She fully understood these consequences
Yet in the U.S., she:
claimed she was “forcibly revoked,”
claimed she was “persecuted,”
claimed she was “taking multiple Bar exams,”
claimed she was “preparing for the next attempt,”
failed to disclose the actual termination and cancellation.
If she omitted these facts in any immigration, employment, Bar-related, or legal filings, it could constitute:
✔ Immigration Fraud (8 USC §1182(a)(6)(C)(i))
✔ False Statements (18 USC §1001)
✔ Loss of immigration benefits
✔ Removal (Deportation)
✔ Permanent ineligibility for any U.S. Bar license
Why? Because:
In legal professions, competence is secondary.
Integrity is everything.
Failure to disclose termination =
automatic moral character death penalty.
Especially for someone who claims to be an eight-year criminal lawyer.
She knows the rules.
She knows the consequences.
She knew what she chose to conceal.
This is the legal definition of:
Knowingly and willfully misrepresenting a material fact.
A very serious violation.
🔥 FINAL VERDICT
The real issue is not whether she tried hard,
nor whether she failed an exam.
The issue is:
She turned one possible exam into several;
Turned a voluntary departure into persecution;
Turned automatic cancellation into political retaliation;
Turned total ineligibility into “preparing for the fourth attempt.”
To the public, this is deception.
To the system, this is concealment.
To the legal profession, this is an integrity breach.
To U.S. law, this is knowingly misrepresenting the truth.
She was not excluded from the California Bar by the system.
She was excluded by her own narrative,
which collapsed under the weight of her own documents.
@Nobody197575
@Zealots2022
@SolomonYue
@USCIS
@FBI
@ICEgov
@Zealots2022
@usa912152217
@tangbaiqiao
@EricLDaugh
@GordonGChang
@GuntherEagleman
@w_terrence
@jp20230630
@IrisTaoTV
@Zealots2022
@tangbaiqiao
@WangNextDoor2
@EricLDaugh
@GaryQ37208050
@BobWang71661875
@ChooLucia
@DHSgov
@elonmusk
@VP
@Pathusa November 11, 2025
D-471
日産のApril showerでみんなが髪わしゃわしゃしてたクプス真似してたけどしれっとう〜もしてたのおもろかったな
またこのステージ立つの見たいね
#1日1ウジ https://t.co/RqHiQyfyLk November 11, 2025
<ポストの表示について>
本サイトではXの利用規約に沿ってポストを表示させていただいております。ポストの非表示を希望される方はこちらのお問い合わせフォームまでご連絡下さい。こちらのデータはAPIでも販売しております。



